Live demo mode. AI dispatches return fictional vendor cards. Real transactions launching with first pilot partners. Terms of Service and Privacy Policy in counsel review; drafts available upon request via /contact.

For litigation teams

Your AI dispatches the work. Vendors quote in minutes.

Court reporters, records, experts, process servers, e-discovery, translation, trial graphics, mediators - dispatched from inside the AI assistant your team already uses. No portal. No phone tag. No 90s-era directory.

Free for firms. Forever. Scope takes a commission from vendors only when a quote is awarded. You see one invoice, from the vendor, at the rate they quoted.

No card required. Founding partner conversations active across legal, claims, in-house, and corporate legal.
Scope · live procurement · matter LP-2026-441
Records retrieval · Mt. Sinai Medical Center · last 5 years
Dispatched from your AI · 3 integrated agencies · HIPAA-cleared

You email your default vendor every Friday afternoon. You take whatever quote comes back. You move on. You have no idea what the market would have quoted.

Jack Gillen, Founder of Scope. Eight-plus years in the legal-support industry across multiple companies, selling into law firms, claims teams, and corporate legal departments. Watched litigators default to one vendor every Friday for eight-plus years. Built Scope because vendor procurement infrastructure in legal services hasn't been digitized in any meaningful way - and the AI assistants legal teams now use don't know how to dispatch to a vendor.

Before Scope / After Scope

One vendor request. Twenty-four touchpoints, or three bids.

Same scope, two processes. The chaos on top is real. The lane below is what your team actually wants.

Before

Vendor request, the long way.

  • Did the COI come in?
  • Has anyone followed up?
  • Did anyone email the vendor?
  • Per-page or flat fee?
  • Why are we paying twice?
  • Who's the backup vendor?
  • Where's the matter number?
  • Is this the right matter?
  • Where's the invoice?
  • Did legal sign the MSA yet?

Twenty-four touchpoints. One scope.

After

Vendor request, the Scope way.

SC-1042San Diego CA

Deposition, 6/12, Spanish interpreter

  • Vendor A$1,840Available 6/12
  • Vendor B$1,720Available 6/12
  • Vendor C$1,690Available 6/12

All three credentialed. Conflict check clear.

Three bids. One scope.

And it doesn't stop at award

Every follow-up runs through the same AI assistant. You never open another portal.

After award, your AI keeps coordinating through the same Scope MCP. Reschedule. Modify scope. Add a videographer. Cancel and rebook. Status check. You stay inside the AI workflow your team already uses.

Day 2 - via your AI

"Reschedule the Bakersfield depo to Wednesday."

Your AI handles. Vendor confirms. You move on.
Day 2 - via your AI

"Add a videographer to the Tuesday booking."

Your AI handles. Vendor confirms. You move on.
Day 2 - via your AI

"What's the status on the records request from last week?"

Your AI handles. Vendor confirms. You move on.
Day 2 - via your AI

"Cancel and rebook with Vendor A instead."

Your AI handles. Vendor confirms. You move on.
What changes for your firm
Eliminated overpayment
Eliminated overpayment

Three credentialed vendors return bids inside ten minutes. You see side-by-side prices before you award, so the default-vendor markup goes away. The savings show up at year-end reconciliation, not in a marketing claim.

Reclaimed billable time
Reclaimed billable time

Lawyers bill 2.6 of 8 hours per day. The other 5.4 are admin and coordination work that doesn't show up on a time sheet (Clio 2024 Legal Trends Report). Vendor coordination is a meaningful slice of that. Scope moves the slice to your AI assistant.

Cancellation handling
0
awkward fights

Cancellation terms are part of the quote. The agency accepts when they quote. Your firm accepts at award. Refund handling runs through Stripe Connect when engagements cancel. No more email fights three months later.

The objection you already have

"How does this not become another tool we don't use?"

Fair. Most legal-tech doesn't survive the first month at a busy litigation team. Scope is built so it doesn't need to.

There's no portal you have to log into. You dispatch from inside whatever AI assistant your firm already uses. If your team isn't using AI assistants yet, dispatch via email or your case-management system - same outcome.

There's no learning curve. You type the request the way you'd say it. Your AI handles the rest. Quotes come back from named vendors with availability and rates. You review and award.

Block list enforced. Vendors you've blocked never see your scope. Conflict parties captured at intake for vendor self-declare. Maintain a do-not-route list for vendors you've had sour history with - they're never notified, never see the scope, never appear in your quotes.

There's no behavior change required. Your existing default vendors can join Scope and quote. Or you can keep using them off-platform - their performance record still builds from your Scope-mediated engagements. The platform doesn't fight the relationships you already have.

One matter, multiple vendors

One matter needs multiple categories. Records, IMEs, depositions, experts, e-discovery - dispatch each through your AI.

Your AI dispatches a multi-category request through Scope; the MCP returns parallel sub-scopes per category. Quotes return per category, from different agencies that cover that category. You award each independently. Your AI coordinates status across all of them. One matter file, one reputation graph, all invoices settled and routed.

Scope · multi-vendor matter · matter LP-2026-441
One matter · four vendor categories · one matter file
Plaintiff PI case · Smith v. Acme · dispatched and coordinated through your AI
Role
Vendor
Status
Rate
Records retrieval
RecordPath
Booked
$850
IME (orthopedic)
Cornerstone IME Network
Confirmed
$1,950
Court reporter
Vendor A
Booked
$575
Expert witness (econ)
Vendor B
In review
$4,500/hr
Routed to matter file · LP-2026-441
Total budgeted$0
How you manage your roster

Tier vendors, lock rates, screen conflicts. Promote and demote based on real performance.

Your roster is the system of record. Drag vendors between primary, backup, and excluded tiers per category. Locked rate cards travel with the tier. Conflict matrices import from your case management when the Clio integration ships (Q3 2026). Performance flags surface when a vendor's on-time slips - one click to demote.

scope · roster
tier vendors · lock rates · screen conflicts
Current roster · two backup-eligible court reporters, one flagged for slipping on-time
Vendor A
Court reporting
Primary
rate $5.75/page
on-time 96%
matters 412
Vendor B
Court reporting
Backup
rate $6.10/page
on-time 94%
matters 186
Vendor C
Court reporting
Backup
rate $7.25/page
on-time 92%
matters 94
Vendor D
Videography
Primary
rate $425 flat
on-time 98%
matters 201
Vendor E
Court reporting
Backup
rate $8.00/page
on-time 78%
matters 31
On-time slipped
drag-drop tiers · locked rates · auto conflict screen · do-not-route
Your morning briefing

One MCP call across every active matter.

$ claude run scope_briefing
Your dashboard, after a typical morning
  • calendar setSC-2143

    Deposition scheduled - Vendor A - May 28

    12m ago
  • work completedSC-2138

    Records received - 1,847 pages - Vendor B

    45m ago
  • quote receivedSC-2141

    Expert quote returned - $4,500/hr - Vendor C

    1h ago
  • quote awardedSC-2136

    Process serving awarded - Vendor D

    3h ago
  • scope createdSC-2144

    Subpoena scope opened to vendors - records retrieval

    5h ago
Founding partner conversations active

Hire your next vendor through Scope.

No card required. Sign up, connect your AI workflow, and your next vendor request gets named-vendor quotes back through your AI.

On Anthropic's MCP Registry. Contributing to Anthropic's Claude for Legal. Founding partners forming across categories.
Install Scope

Now installable in Cowork, ChatGPT, Claude.ai, Claude Code, and any MCP-compatible AI client.

/plugin marketplace add github.com/scope-bid/scope-platform
<-See the other views